Standards

• The standards are based on our current understanding of fundamental principles and best practices in designing, maintaining, and enhancing medical education programmes
• Standards are intended to guide medical education programme development and evaluation, facilitate diagnosis of strengths and weaknesses relating to the medical education programme, and to stimulate quality improvement
• Each institution or regulator should review the relevant standards and develop a version of them that is appropriate to the local context. It would be helpful if those local, contextual standards are mapped on to the original WFME standards
• Not all standards will have application in every setting

It is possible for a medical school to receive a satisfactory overall evaluation and maintain accreditation (where appropriate) without necessarily meeting every standard and sub-standard.

The WFME programme on global standards in medical education has three main aims:

• to stimulate authorities, organisations and institutions having responsibility for medical education to formulate their own plans for change and for quality improvement in accordance with international best practice;
• to establish a system of national and/or international evaluation, accreditation and recognition of medical educational institutions and programmes to assure minimum quality standards for the programmes; and
• to safeguard practice in medicine and the medical workforce in the context of increasing internationalisation.

The original trilogy of WFME global standards (2003) was developed by three international taskforces involving more than 60 medical education experts from across the six WHO-WFME regions. Updates were defined by a small working group and a broad international panel of experts (2012, 2015).

It is the prerogative of nationally appointed agencies to determine the level that will be required for accreditation of medical schools within the remit of each agency. The WFME standards offer a template for accreditation but the level must be specified, modified or supplemented in accordance with regional, national and institutional needs and priorities. Standards must be clearly defined, and be meaningful, appropriate, relevant, measurable, achievable and accepted by the users. Furthermore, accreditation must give emphasis to improvement, and provide guidance for advancement, instead of simply advocating ‘fulfilment of standards’ as the ultimate goal.

Supplementary guidance published alongside the 2015 Standards in BME describes how an accrediting agency might interpret the standards to define measures for how a medical school meets the different aspects.

WFME publishes the standards in English. We do not have the resource to provide official translations of the standards documents, however we are keen to make the standards accessible. We publish translations on the WFME website, with credit given to the translator, where we are confident that the nuances of the language and the intended meaning has been conveyed.

For permission to translate the WFME standards, please email admin@wfme.org

For general questions, clarifications or to provide feedback on the standards documents please email admin@wfme.org

WFME can offer advice to a medical school or agency in interpreting the WFME standards in the local, regional or national context. Details of how to request an advisory visit and associated fees are set out in the WFME policy.